I seem to have been on a journey to discover what I think about many items. Lately, it seems that I have been questioned about what writing science fiction is all about. Again and again it returns to the idea that science fiction should be something almost handed from alien beings, so startling and all amazing that it will set politicians to changing their governments, scientists to changing science, workers to learning new skills, and everyone goes for a fantastic journey never seen before and then have a fabulous time.
So what do I think?
First and foremost, science fiction is literature. It is a reflection of an individual, a society, a world. It touches the senses, leads to new thoughts or understandings, and is aware enough of humananity at any level to be seen to contain truth.
So what is science fiction?
Well, it is literature. It uses science, and scientific concepts to help convey understanding about some idea to the reading audience. It often has one or more characters that is a scientist and/or uses the scientific method to solve problems. It many times proposes different solutions to human, animal, social or world problems.
Some say that that science should be about the latest, hottest new development on the scientific publication stream to help share to others of the most knowledgeable what is available but in an entertaining mode so that at a quick read, one gets the gist and therefore can skip plugging away through all the science books, science museums, science lectures, new science concepts and pow, have a grand fun time. As if it could. Sort of like the 400 words or less science articles that merely tease us all and never answer all our questions.
So why would a science fiction writer want to sell a book to the people who have worked for years in the field and expect to teach them something new? Well, for one, most scientists can barely keep up with all the developments of their own field and barely touch other fields. For two, in creating a science fiction world, if you just look at one aspect of science, your world looks dull or lopsided because scientific development goes in waves -- i.e. one development in one area kicks off similar developments in other waves. For three, science fiction can propose trends, invention lines, question practices and warn of problems, corruption, dangers and more. But still and all, it is a very small market compared to all the readers in the world.
So should science fiction writers try to teach those who don't have a science background something about science? Isn't that the role of teachers? And if not, what if they teach the wrong thing, does anyone dare to let that happen, with the result that youth will have their heads screwed up? That sort of implies that they aren't questioning, thinking, researching, scientific minded beings. Ooops. Surely the world isn't that bad. And do the teachers and books and museums have the power to take their audience on that ultimate ride that literature does?
After all, reading and writing are always about representing reality, the testing always occurs in the mind of the reader. So I am back at the point that science fiction is literature, the literature of now, this world, this future, the future that many of us are trailing behind the leaders that have dedicated all their lives to defining. Including moms, including, high school students, college students, professors ... everyone and anyone that wants to take the ride. It may take the reader to other worlds, but they all have the science of our universe.
So should science fiction be only for those looking for the ultimate high of learning the latest about the latest? Many college students graduate after taking their one required science class. Many college students with a bachelor of science, have only had 25 credits at most of any other science and varying levels of math--some college students graduate with a high school equivalency of math. Many do not have the money or time to take more classes in math or science. Do they not deserve a science fiction novel about evolutionary theory? Or macroeconomics (not a requirement at all but a college undergraduate option) ? Or bioengineering? Or psychology? or statistics?
Should science fiction be scary?
Yes, and no. The use of science shouldn't be scary, the potential for danger in any profession should always be examined. Many science fiction stories bridge/d the gaps between science and those who wish to know more. Many science fiction stories bridge/d the gaps between others who think from many different modes of thought.
Should science fiction have an authoritative, professorial voice? Why? Those sorts have already taken the journey, why not take someone who isn't on the professional scientist journey by letting them step in the footsteps of people, ordinary people, like girls, mothers, artist, factory workers, plumbers, stock market analysts by letting them feel safe with their identification with one or more characters and letting them learn in a safe manner something new. Same goes for other ethnic groups and locations for placing the novel. It is not uncommon for students to study in other countries, for a pipe to break in China, France or Africa, or for the poor to want to learn more about the world. Why should they be denied college and then denied the right to read something understandable about science that they don't know, just because the latest hot discovery about black holes requires a 15 system of equation model (greatly simplified) that even the physicists (i.e. Einstein) have to ask the mathematicians for help defining?
Now that sounds likes so much fun. Oh yeah, and the ride should take you someplace new and exciting and unimagined.
Well, that is all of my thoughts on this topic for the moment.
Recent Comments